Skip to main content
Cart

Hilti Profis vs Simpson Anchor Designer (Kwik Hus vs Titen HD)

Posted by MATT MANCLalmost 3 years ago
Hilti Profis vs Simpson Anchor Designer (Kwik Hus vs Titen HD)

I am a structural engineer trying to design a connection with (2) concrete screw anchors into a concrete stem wall (Hilti Kwik Hus EZ).  Obviously, the edge distance is a critical part of the design and with 1-1/2" edge distance, the concrete edge failure is controlling the design. It looks like the load applied (Vua) for this check is the entire/full shear load inputted. Under the "shear load" report section of the output there is a double asterisk that indicates "anchor group (relevant anchors)." Can you explain what this double asterisk means?

Furthermore, comparing the similar conditions with Simpson's Anchor Designer, Simpson appears to be SPLITTING the shear load equally among the 2 fasteners and then comparing the (halved) value to the phiVn design strength for the concrete breakout. This is essentially resulting in double the capacity of the connection compared to the results from Profis.

Can you explain why the Vua value in Profis is the full shear load when there are (2) fasteners? Can this shear value be assumed to be split evenly among both anchors?

Cracked Concrete in PROFIS Engineering,1/4 hilti kwik HUS-EZ,Shear Edge Distance

2 Replies
Posted by Danielle Fileralmost 3 years ago
Hilti Verified

Hi Matt,

Hilti takes this conservative approach on shear due to the size of the base plate hole and not being able to guarantee that the plate will be bearing on both anchors evenly (distributing the shear load evenly.) Therefore, Hilti conservatively assumes one anchor will take all of the shear load in the event the plate is only bearing on one of the anchors. While this isn't ideal, Hilti uses conservative assumptions like this one due to a wide variety of backgrounds of people using the software.

The definition of the asterisks is what you highlighted in the report (see attachment). Whether it is based on the highest loaded anchor*, or the anchor group**.

Regards,
Dani

concrete breakout failure,PROFIS Engineering concrete breakout

2 comments on this reply
Posted by Danielle Fileralmost 3 years ago
Hi Matt! Unfortunately, there is no way to override or change this at the moment! You would be limited to doing a hand calculation to distribute the shear.

Posted by MATT MANCLalmost 3 years ago
Thank you Dani. I understand the limits/assumptions based on the user variation. Is there a way to override this particular assumption within Profis?